reh
Dec 8, 04:51 PM
What's a modem? :)
It's quite likely you use one to get online (dialup, DSL, or cable). ;)
It's quite likely you use one to get online (dialup, DSL, or cable). ;)
Bennieboy�
Apr 8, 09:17 PM
you could read the Rules (http://guides.macrumors.com/Help:Marketplace_Rules) ;)
countach
Oct 26, 08:13 AM
Would that be possibly that Apple is trying to patent as many as possible user interface/method so that no one can get anything closer to the REAL video iPod?
I think there's a lot of truth in this.
The idea in this patent looks VERY intuitive to me, but it does fall down in being usable one-handed.
Nobody knows what Apple will actually come out with, nor when they will do it. It wouldn't surprise me if Apple take another 9 months to release the "true" video ipod. They've got some difficult engineering to do!
I think there's a lot of truth in this.
The idea in this patent looks VERY intuitive to me, but it does fall down in being usable one-handed.
Nobody knows what Apple will actually come out with, nor when they will do it. It wouldn't surprise me if Apple take another 9 months to release the "true" video ipod. They've got some difficult engineering to do!
player9
Sep 14, 12:03 AM
I did some more research on this and it appears that we will have to wait probably for the Linux programmers to port Foomatic to OSX. That is if Epson does not release a driver eventually.
I tried to follow the directions on this site, but this assumes that you are running Linux and that Foomatic is already installed, along with Ghostscript and CUPS. I was able to apply the PPD file for the EPL-5700 to my printer and see it in Print Center but the in between framework is missing: the cupsomatic script and Foomatic system. I can print but the printer does not respond, so CUPS is not sending the data to the printer.
I couldn't figure out where to put the cupsomatic script since OSX does not have the directory substructure of redhat.
http://www.linuxprinting.org/foomatic.html
http://www.linuxprinting.org/cups-doc.html
I also found this site helpful:
http://www.danka.de/apple-cups-en/
I tried to follow the directions on this site, but this assumes that you are running Linux and that Foomatic is already installed, along with Ghostscript and CUPS. I was able to apply the PPD file for the EPL-5700 to my printer and see it in Print Center but the in between framework is missing: the cupsomatic script and Foomatic system. I can print but the printer does not respond, so CUPS is not sending the data to the printer.
I couldn't figure out where to put the cupsomatic script since OSX does not have the directory substructure of redhat.
http://www.linuxprinting.org/foomatic.html
http://www.linuxprinting.org/cups-doc.html
I also found this site helpful:
http://www.danka.de/apple-cups-en/
wizard
Apr 4, 07:57 PM
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8G4 Safari/6533.18.5)
The AIRs are possibly the most improved machine Apple has e we come out with. Apple went from selling junk to selling a benchmark ultra portable machine.
Sadly I'm not in the market, mostly because I need far more secondary storage. That is certain to be addressed as flash shrinks. However I was actually disappointed that the recent MBP updates didn't take advantage of some of the ideas expressed in the AIR. It looks like Apples Mac Book Pro design team is a little stale.
The AIRs are possibly the most improved machine Apple has e we come out with. Apple went from selling junk to selling a benchmark ultra portable machine.
Sadly I'm not in the market, mostly because I need far more secondary storage. That is certain to be addressed as flash shrinks. However I was actually disappointed that the recent MBP updates didn't take advantage of some of the ideas expressed in the AIR. It looks like Apples Mac Book Pro design team is a little stale.
jnc
Jan 21, 03:47 AM
I'm right there with you on this one. Please add some more inputs. HDMI!
Yeah! Or change their names back to "Studio" Displays because Cinema indicates I can watch some films on this thing - yet it can't even hook up to a :apple:tv/PS3! :p
Yeah! Or change their names back to "Studio" Displays because Cinema indicates I can watch some films on this thing - yet it can't even hook up to a :apple:tv/PS3! :p
Counterfit
Dec 9, 10:45 PM
I personally prefer personal computing devices to have some unreliability. It teaches us not to rely on them too much.
Yeah, I got a bunch of stuff done while my MBP was down for the count.
Yeah, I got a bunch of stuff done while my MBP was down for the count.
nosen
Oct 4, 10:09 AM
ditto - am I the only one who isn't a fan/simply does't care for GPS units?
funny, my post was deleted.
anyway, I definitely think this sounds pretty gimmicky. it might be kind of neat if its free, its not something I would spend any money on...
funny, my post was deleted.
anyway, I definitely think this sounds pretty gimmicky. it might be kind of neat if its free, its not something I would spend any money on...
aussiechris
Apr 14, 08:29 PM
G'day Guys,
I have been having a look around for a solution to my slow network problem, with no luck. Hopefully somebody here can help me.
I have 2 mac pro systems I use for audio and video work. They are on the company network which seems to be 10/100 and a little slow. When I am transferring large files between the two machines (which are on opposite sides of the room) it takes forever because the speed is limited to 100Base-T and not 1000 that the computers can work at. This is no good. I need speed. Can I run a private network on the Ethernet 2 sockets for transferring data between the 2 computers? How can I set it up so that these computers will always choose this private network for transferring data? Will this work when transferring data for Qmaster jobs?
As no other computers will need to be on the network, I assume it is as simple as plugging the two computers together with an Ethernet cable and making sure they can see each other. The hard part is making sure they always use this network and not the company network.
Ideas anyone?
Cheers,
Chris
I have been having a look around for a solution to my slow network problem, with no luck. Hopefully somebody here can help me.
I have 2 mac pro systems I use for audio and video work. They are on the company network which seems to be 10/100 and a little slow. When I am transferring large files between the two machines (which are on opposite sides of the room) it takes forever because the speed is limited to 100Base-T and not 1000 that the computers can work at. This is no good. I need speed. Can I run a private network on the Ethernet 2 sockets for transferring data between the 2 computers? How can I set it up so that these computers will always choose this private network for transferring data? Will this work when transferring data for Qmaster jobs?
As no other computers will need to be on the network, I assume it is as simple as plugging the two computers together with an Ethernet cable and making sure they can see each other. The hard part is making sure they always use this network and not the company network.
Ideas anyone?
Cheers,
Chris
MongoTheGeek
Oct 26, 07:09 AM
My concern is if you have big fingers, or a poor grip strength, holding the thing will inadvertently set off the buttons if they are on the bezel
Jade Cambell
Feb 5, 11:49 AM
Tempted - what boot loader is on it (what firmware was it when it was out of the box)? What week number is on it (4th and 5th digits of the SN).
Week 38. The original firmware was 1.0.2 I think. It was the firmware right before 1.1.1, whichever one that was. And it's currently on 1.1.3.
Week 38. The original firmware was 1.0.2 I think. It was the firmware right before 1.1.1, whichever one that was. And it's currently on 1.1.3.
digitalbiker
Oct 24, 10:38 PM
Ah, but YOU'RE missing the point completely. As resolutions inscrease the interface can scale up because it is resolution independent in 10.5. Web pages are NOT resolution independent for the most part. Photos, graphics, interfaces are not. So, when you're looking at your killter 3000x2000 monitor yes your icons and OS interface can scale up and your photos will look very crisp BECAUSE they are vector or have extra resolution to draw from. Websites on the other hand will be fixed at 800x600 or whatever and unless you want them to be miniscule on your screen as they are shown pixel for pixel, they will have to be blown up in some way.
So the res independence IS a good thing and just fine UNTIL the monitor resolutions go through the roof for the same physical screen sizes.
There are too many things outthere that are desinged WITHOUT the independence. Icons inside nearly every application for example. All kinds of stuff. My guess is that this won't affect too much too quickly. It just addresses some issues with the current interface on high screen monitors.
There is no reason that internet images can't scale right along with everything else. Just because something is bitmapped doesn't mean it can't scale nicely. There are a million decent algorythms for scaling bitmapped images.
If an image is designed to look nice with a 72 dpi resolution and your monitor is at 144 dpi, then the image will be the identical size, shape and appearance as a 72 dpi monitor when the image is scaled 2 to 1 on the 144 dpi monitor.
Where is the problem? The resolution independence will come from the browser rendering not from the website design. In otherwords, if a user scales safari up on a high-res monitor then the contents will scale as well regardless of what the contents are, bitmap image, vector image, etc.
So the res independence IS a good thing and just fine UNTIL the monitor resolutions go through the roof for the same physical screen sizes.
There are too many things outthere that are desinged WITHOUT the independence. Icons inside nearly every application for example. All kinds of stuff. My guess is that this won't affect too much too quickly. It just addresses some issues with the current interface on high screen monitors.
There is no reason that internet images can't scale right along with everything else. Just because something is bitmapped doesn't mean it can't scale nicely. There are a million decent algorythms for scaling bitmapped images.
If an image is designed to look nice with a 72 dpi resolution and your monitor is at 144 dpi, then the image will be the identical size, shape and appearance as a 72 dpi monitor when the image is scaled 2 to 1 on the 144 dpi monitor.
Where is the problem? The resolution independence will come from the browser rendering not from the website design. In otherwords, if a user scales safari up on a high-res monitor then the contents will scale as well regardless of what the contents are, bitmap image, vector image, etc.
beto2k7
May 3, 12:38 PM
Do you need it now of not?
billysea
Apr 18, 11:52 AM
With such high praise of the iPhone 4's industrial design, I would be surprise if Apple decided to get rid of it for something new in just a year. It would be a waste too as it still feels fresh to a lot of people. Not to mention it will be very hard to beat (if there is a new redesign).
Even the original iPhone form factor stayed for 3 generations.
Even the original iPhone form factor stayed for 3 generations.
sb11710
Feb 21, 12:18 AM
http://www.theapplecollection.com/Collection/AppleMovies/index.html
gpzjock
May 4, 05:55 AM
Lion should be out Summer don't hold yer breath. :)
http://thetechjournal.com/electronics/iphone/ios-5-mac-os-x-lion-release-date-must-read-ios-5-and-mac-os-x-lion-release-date-confirmed.xhtml
http://thetechjournal.com/electronics/iphone/ios-5-mac-os-x-lion-release-date-must-read-ios-5-and-mac-os-x-lion-release-date-confirmed.xhtml
mikeyredk
Sep 6, 09:35 AM
ahh man i could have used this when i was on my internship. oh well off to class than
Advance The Man
Mar 17, 03:36 PM
Thank you both - it's working.
TheRealTVGuy
Mar 14, 09:22 PM
HA-HA !!!
We Win!
We Win!
Frozonecold
Jun 19, 12:04 PM
I am selling my Philips Portable DVD player. It has never been used and it's box has never been opened. I bought it because of it's impressive feature set. The fancy features for this model are:
Swivelyy Screen (useful if you don't want to have to keep it on your lap)
Built in iPod dock (the ipod sits flush inside the DVD player and allows you to watch movies stored on your iPod)
Dual headphone ports (so a friend can also listen to the movie)
Remote control
FREE CAR ADAPTOR (sorry I like the Caps lock)
Dolby Digital sound
Extra Bright Display
Built in high quality stereo speakers
SD card slot (use as digital picture frame/viewer)
LIGHTWEIGHT (sorry Caps lock again)
Swivelyy Screen (useful if you don't want to have to keep it on your lap)
Built in iPod dock (the ipod sits flush inside the DVD player and allows you to watch movies stored on your iPod)
Dual headphone ports (so a friend can also listen to the movie)
Remote control
FREE CAR ADAPTOR (sorry I like the Caps lock)
Dolby Digital sound
Extra Bright Display
Built in high quality stereo speakers
SD card slot (use as digital picture frame/viewer)
LIGHTWEIGHT (sorry Caps lock again)
markmcrobie
Mar 27, 01:43 AM
Comex has gotten it jailbroken on the 14th but it still needs a little refining, it is Untethered not tethered as its userland exploit
Wrong way round - it's userland, therefore WILL be tethered. See explanation here:
http://bit.ly/gN060d
Wrong way round - it's userland, therefore WILL be tethered. See explanation here:
http://bit.ly/gN060d
Flowbee
Mar 19, 10:11 AM
After years of abandonment finally someone at Apple said, 'oh crap yeah what's this Logic thing we have? We should probably put some resources on that.'
That's pretty funny, except...
Logic 9 was released in July of 2009 (8 months ago), and
Logic 9.1 was released in January of this year (2 months ago).
lol
That's pretty funny, except...
Logic 9 was released in July of 2009 (8 months ago), and
Logic 9.1 was released in January of this year (2 months ago).
lol
Stella
Apr 15, 10:32 AM
Its all about convergence.
If your on the go then its more convenient to play games on a smartphone - one device than carry around two.
At the moment - drawbacks over portable gaming consoles - (1) battery life (2) games on smartphones tend to have a lot less content.. but smartphone games tend to be signficantly cheaper. If you want a game containing depth then your not going to be looking at your smartphone at the moment.
In some countries its totally fine to watch TV on your smartphone too...
If your on the go then its more convenient to play games on a smartphone - one device than carry around two.
At the moment - drawbacks over portable gaming consoles - (1) battery life (2) games on smartphones tend to have a lot less content.. but smartphone games tend to be signficantly cheaper. If you want a game containing depth then your not going to be looking at your smartphone at the moment.
In some countries its totally fine to watch TV on your smartphone too...
MaxBurn
May 3, 04:00 PM
Three things to try
Right click and run as administrator.
Compatibility mode, try xp sp3
Cpu affinity to 0 - may not be necessary
Mine was locking up on the updating image step but one of the first two fixed it.
Right click and run as administrator.
Compatibility mode, try xp sp3
Cpu affinity to 0 - may not be necessary
Mine was locking up on the updating image step but one of the first two fixed it.
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий