yellow
Dec 19, 01:14 PM
Thumbs up, nice concept.
yoak
Sep 13, 03:02 AM
Why wanna wait for a 300$ iTV half a year when you can have a 24" iMac now?!?!?!?!? And I'm laughing: WIRELESS... but Ethernet Port etc. p.p.... very helpful! No thanks guys, I'm gonna buy the Cinema-iMac!!!
:cool:
I´m guessing here, but the price maybe?;)
:cool:
I´m guessing here, but the price maybe?;)
trainguy77
Aug 27, 04:54 PM
@#$%*&!(%#@!)!!!!!! A bit frustrating that I'm gonna lose a spot again... :mad:
haha yeah you remember when i was bugging you about going to pass you? Then i had those problems with it crashing my system...but they must have fixed it now. I am back at it...:p
haha yeah you remember when i was bugging you about going to pass you? Then i had those problems with it crashing my system...but they must have fixed it now. I am back at it...:p
2807
Apr 9, 12:58 PM
Hi.
Can I "dual boot" and have bootcamp-Windows on one screen and OSX on another? Or when using Bootcamp do I HAVE to choose one or the other?
It would be awesome to have the power/stability/support of bootcamp and have OSX running at the same time.... and just use "spaces" to toggle around.
Also, is Windows 7 the preferred OS to use now? I have been using XP for a long time and am ready to upgrade, but have no idea what to get.
Can I "dual boot" and have bootcamp-Windows on one screen and OSX on another? Or when using Bootcamp do I HAVE to choose one or the other?
It would be awesome to have the power/stability/support of bootcamp and have OSX running at the same time.... and just use "spaces" to toggle around.
Also, is Windows 7 the preferred OS to use now? I have been using XP for a long time and am ready to upgrade, but have no idea what to get.
benchlegs
Apr 28, 09:56 PM
Dropbox is the simple answer. Try it, you'll like it!
janstett
Aug 8, 06:58 AM
Anyone else remember those old rumors about how MS was buying VPC just to kill it off? I thought that was silly back then, but I'm wondering now. Considering how they sat on the thing for ages and never really did anything with it and now have caved at the first sign of competition, you have to wonder. They clearly were not very committed to keeping it going.
Not true, you just have to change your perspective. MS isn't interested in Virtual PC as a consumer product, as useful as it is; VPC as a power user tool is a well kept secret. They always had their eye on it for use in virtual servers. That's why it's going to be built into Vista Server and they are pushing it now as "Virtual Server 2005".
Sad to see Virtual PC go, both on the Mac and on the PC too (I run Red Hat on my Dell via VPC, very handy). Thank God a product like Parallels came along, and also that it also exists on the PC... I will have to make new virtual machines of my favorite operating systems one more time, but I do have to say Parallels is better than VPC.
Not true, you just have to change your perspective. MS isn't interested in Virtual PC as a consumer product, as useful as it is; VPC as a power user tool is a well kept secret. They always had their eye on it for use in virtual servers. That's why it's going to be built into Vista Server and they are pushing it now as "Virtual Server 2005".
Sad to see Virtual PC go, both on the Mac and on the PC too (I run Red Hat on my Dell via VPC, very handy). Thank God a product like Parallels came along, and also that it also exists on the PC... I will have to make new virtual machines of my favorite operating systems one more time, but I do have to say Parallels is better than VPC.
projectle
Dec 14, 09:48 AM
Ok...
Then, is there a program somewhere that while running would prevent the computer from going to sleep (rather than a standard configuration page)?
Then, is there a program somewhere that while running would prevent the computer from going to sleep (rather than a standard configuration page)?
ddma
Oct 26, 07:23 AM
Would that be possibly that Apple is trying to patent as many as possible user interface/method so that no one can get anything closer to the REAL video iPod?
Mitthrawnuruodo
Dec 19, 08:11 AM
Awesome! :cool:
Maybe the coolest static Apple 'tar I've seen so far... :)
Maybe the coolest static Apple 'tar I've seen so far... :)
Kielzog
Oct 5, 04:44 PM
I was quite impressed with Microsoft's idea of Photosynth (http://labs.live.com/photosynth/). Apparently it stitches user photo's together and gives a 3D view of a place. Of course a lot of things can be automated if the exact GPS coordinates are known. A GPS enabled camera could provide this and the combination of Google Earth could be just the thing Apple is looking for.
Platform
Oct 26, 07:27 AM
Hmm...hope the real thing turns out different :o
gauriemma
Oct 26, 11:21 AM
Also, does anyone else think it's weird that these fingers actually look like fingers?!? In a patent drawing?:eek:
I think it's weird that they misspelled the word "friends" in the drawings.
I think it's weird that they misspelled the word "friends" in the drawings.
Bobthemonkey
Sep 14, 04:27 PM
at least they had the good grace to reply to you in what seems like a non-automated manner.
its more than some companies would do
its more than some companies would do
mac4evan
Oct 25, 07:09 PM
This has not really been the case, though. When VHS was replaced by DVD, you didn't get the new media for free. Being locked into a particular platform occurs all the time--toner cartridges for printers aren't standardized, for example. I can't use Comcast's on demand to buy programs, then switch to DirecTV and have them transferred. When I buy the latest video game, it doesn't come packaged with PS2, PC, Mac, and XBOX versions.
See the theme? If you choose a limited hardware platform, you must accept the constraints of that platform. CDs are universal because the standard was universal (Sony, Philips, etc. formed a consortium from the get-go)--multiple manufacturers make CD players. Here, the content is the same but the packaging is different--cassette, CD, M4A. Only Apple makes M4A players.
By purchasing a song from iTunes, you are receiving the file with limitations. The reason for the price is bundling. If you want a product with no restrictions, which you want to use to the fullest extent of fair use (or beyond, if you so choose), you have to look elsewhere. You're not being denied fair use when you rent a movie on VHS for $2 when the DVD rental is $4...and you don't get to rent the VHS, then make a DVD just to save $2. Likewise, you're not paying for an unrestricted copy of the song on iTunes, and you aren't entitled to treat it as such using "fair use" as an excuse.
If you want unencumbered music, pay for the CD. If you want instant gratification and a lower price, then be an adult and accept the DRM. The option you want is out there and legally available--it's just that CDs are a "bad value." Likewise, iTunes tracks are probably a "bad value" to many people who think 99 cents should entitle them to DRM-free files. Should DRMed digital files be cheaper? I think so. But that's no excuse to go beyond the clear and publicized terms of my payment.
Nobody wants to buy things twice, but that's no excuse. I have piles of spare tools that fit cars I no longer own; toner cartridges for printers I no longer own; memory cards for cameras I no longer own; and floppy disks for computers I no longer own. Each time I switch companies, I have to deal with the consequences of my prior purchases.
Bravo Bravo Bravo my friend!;)
See the theme? If you choose a limited hardware platform, you must accept the constraints of that platform. CDs are universal because the standard was universal (Sony, Philips, etc. formed a consortium from the get-go)--multiple manufacturers make CD players. Here, the content is the same but the packaging is different--cassette, CD, M4A. Only Apple makes M4A players.
By purchasing a song from iTunes, you are receiving the file with limitations. The reason for the price is bundling. If you want a product with no restrictions, which you want to use to the fullest extent of fair use (or beyond, if you so choose), you have to look elsewhere. You're not being denied fair use when you rent a movie on VHS for $2 when the DVD rental is $4...and you don't get to rent the VHS, then make a DVD just to save $2. Likewise, you're not paying for an unrestricted copy of the song on iTunes, and you aren't entitled to treat it as such using "fair use" as an excuse.
If you want unencumbered music, pay for the CD. If you want instant gratification and a lower price, then be an adult and accept the DRM. The option you want is out there and legally available--it's just that CDs are a "bad value." Likewise, iTunes tracks are probably a "bad value" to many people who think 99 cents should entitle them to DRM-free files. Should DRMed digital files be cheaper? I think so. But that's no excuse to go beyond the clear and publicized terms of my payment.
Nobody wants to buy things twice, but that's no excuse. I have piles of spare tools that fit cars I no longer own; toner cartridges for printers I no longer own; memory cards for cameras I no longer own; and floppy disks for computers I no longer own. Each time I switch companies, I have to deal with the consequences of my prior purchases.
Bravo Bravo Bravo my friend!;)
jiminaus
Mar 27, 08:38 PM
I've not read it, but I'v heard of Scott Thompson, R. (2006) Quartz 2D graphics for Mac OS X developers (http://www.amazon.com/Quartz-2D-Graphics-Mac-Developers/dp/0321336631/).
gwuMACaddict
Dec 31, 11:31 AM
i dig it... its layed out much like my other forum... ridemonkey.com... go arn
JustSomeDude
Apr 3, 02:19 AM
I would try both out, if possible. Some people have other macs and airs and end up using the air more because the ssd makes the experience that much nicer. Of course, you always upgrade the pro to a ssd later.
I personally would go for the pro - I'd look to possibly replace the hd with ssd at a later point, when more money is available, if the ssd is important. Also, the faster processor and additional ram will make it more future proof, in case your computing demands increase in the future.
I personally would go for the pro - I'd look to possibly replace the hd with ssd at a later point, when more money is available, if the ssd is important. Also, the faster processor and additional ram will make it more future proof, in case your computing demands increase in the future.
wide
Mar 25, 11:58 AM
they really are amazing headphones. it's a pity that i can't listen to any of the headphones i have bought in the past few years because they just don't cut it anymore.
you should try the foam earpieces. you remove the rubber pieces, put them on, and then scrunch them up, then stick them in your ear and hold them there for 10 seconds until they expand to form a tight fit. it blocks even more noise than the pre-installed earbuds (but they get dirty really fast, but you can order more on the shure website :))
you should try the foam earpieces. you remove the rubber pieces, put them on, and then scrunch them up, then stick them in your ear and hold them there for 10 seconds until they expand to form a tight fit. it blocks even more noise than the pre-installed earbuds (but they get dirty really fast, but you can order more on the shure website :))
EricNau
Oct 8, 04:37 PM
This is interesting - can anyone confirm that the website didn't do this before?
I'm not sure about before, but I can tell you that it isn't just iphone.org acting this way.
For example, go to http://carbon.com and click on the iTunes tab; it will bring you to http://carbon.com/itunes/.
I don't think it means anything.
I'm not sure about before, but I can tell you that it isn't just iphone.org acting this way.
For example, go to http://carbon.com and click on the iTunes tab; it will bring you to http://carbon.com/itunes/.
I don't think it means anything.
Mechcozmo
Jan 16, 04:28 PM
If it is an iMac, or in fact, any G3, check to see if there is a firmware update that you need to run.
Applejuiced
May 3, 01:39 PM
Try it on another computer maybe.
Al Jonson
Feb 18, 08:37 AM
Thanks. On the subject of editing. I know a track can be muted, but what about a region (section) without having to mute the whole track? Can a region be muted separately?:cool:
Peterkro
Mar 10, 08:45 AM
For the same reasons, these people are also more charitable (http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=628006) than liberals. Conservatives and religious people are far more charitable to both religious and secular causes as a percentage of their income.
You seem to have a strange idea of why the rich give to "charity" see here for instance:
http://articles.latimes.com/2007/oct/01/opinion/oe-reich1
and don't forget the words of that great American President Richard Milhous (tricky dicky) Nixon:
"Let us remember that the main purpose of American aid is not to help other nations but to help ourselves".
(this applies as much to domestic as international "aid" )
You seem to have a strange idea of why the rich give to "charity" see here for instance:
http://articles.latimes.com/2007/oct/01/opinion/oe-reich1
and don't forget the words of that great American President Richard Milhous (tricky dicky) Nixon:
"Let us remember that the main purpose of American aid is not to help other nations but to help ourselves".
(this applies as much to domestic as international "aid" )
ryanfc
Sep 27, 07:00 AM
Well then I would definitely say these 2 I found are both reproductions of some sort since they both have a copyright on them. I kind of figured that was going to be true as it seemed uncharacteristic of apple to mess up a piece of art with a copyright line. So they definitely are not worth the $80 and $60 they are asking for them. Maybe if I can get them down to $10 or something I might buy them. Thanks for your help and input.
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий