frostrated
10-26 02:16 PM
your wife's application should be tied to your PD. If you got it in EB1, then she too should be in EB1. The pearson memo will help. Get an infopass and clarify the issue.
wallpaper Attached to: Ryan Reynolds
vegasbaby
02-28 10:27 PM
Hi Guys,
I used to work for company �a� which was a part of the bigger company �A�. There was another company �b� which was a part of the bigger company �B�.
Now both companies A and B made a joint venture (JV) and made company �c� joining company �a� and �b�.
Company A has 25% stake and company B has 75% stake in JV(Company "c"). The new formed company "c" has �new name�, all employees filed �new employment applications� and have �offered a new employment� with the new company �c�
Now my question is as this company �c� is totally �new�, can I convert my EB3 case to EB2 and use company �a� experience and file for EB2 with company �c�
Thanks,
Yes. As long as company C has a requirement for EB2 position.
I used to work for company �a� which was a part of the bigger company �A�. There was another company �b� which was a part of the bigger company �B�.
Now both companies A and B made a joint venture (JV) and made company �c� joining company �a� and �b�.
Company A has 25% stake and company B has 75% stake in JV(Company "c"). The new formed company "c" has �new name�, all employees filed �new employment applications� and have �offered a new employment� with the new company �c�
Now my question is as this company �c� is totally �new�, can I convert my EB3 case to EB2 and use company �a� experience and file for EB2 with company �c�
Thanks,
Yes. As long as company C has a requirement for EB2 position.
spdy_mn
06-14 02:45 PM
Since there is a mad rush of i485 applications , USCIS is going to do lottery to select applications for approval.Rest of them will be rejected.
What's the source. If you are trying to pull a prank, then let me the first one to tell you that it is N-O-T-F-U-N-N-Y
What's the source. If you are trying to pull a prank, then let me the first one to tell you that it is N-O-T-F-U-N-N-Y
2011 These pics of Ryan Reynolds
liorsal
01-03 12:09 PM
does anyone know if IV core will push to get the 485 relief (ability to file without visa number availeble) and what is the chance to get it befor of until the 15/february?.
more...
Blog Feeds
11-10 03:40 AM
AILA provided a very important update from the State Department, we wish to share with our readers.
The Department of State has issued comprehensive new policy guidance on the use of DNA testing in the visa application process. This new guidance is set forth in a new set of extensive Notes to 9 FAM 42.44.
In this new guidance, the State Department declares DNA technology to be the only acceptable non-documentary method for proving a biological relationship. The preferred specimen collection technique for DNA testing is by buccal (cheek or mouth cavity) swab.
According to the Department, DNA testing is expensive, complex and time consuming and thus should be recommended only if no other credible proof of the claimed relationship exists. Consular officers should treat DNA testing as a last resort: all other possible methods for confirming the existence of a biological relationship must be exhausted before recommending this course of action. Even then, DNA testing may only be recommended, but never required by the consular officer.
Consular officers may recommend DNA testing solely to prove a relationship; they may never recommend DNA testing in an attempt to disprove a relationship. Only DNA test results reporting a 99.5 percent or greater degree of certainty as proof of a biological relationship between a parent and child may be accepted in visa cases.
The Department clarifies that consular officers adjudicating Form I-130 Alien Relative petitions (http://www.h1b.biz/lawyer-attorney-1132137.html)are not authorized to approve the petition if DNA test results are the sole evidence of the claimed biological relationship. Such cases are not "clearly approvable" per the provisions of 9 FAM 42.41 N4.2-3; accordingly, they must be forwarded to USCIS for adjudication. Parenthetically, USCIS is authorized to approve I-130 petitions supported solely on DNA testing.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2009/11/i130_alien_relative_petitions.html)
The Department of State has issued comprehensive new policy guidance on the use of DNA testing in the visa application process. This new guidance is set forth in a new set of extensive Notes to 9 FAM 42.44.
In this new guidance, the State Department declares DNA technology to be the only acceptable non-documentary method for proving a biological relationship. The preferred specimen collection technique for DNA testing is by buccal (cheek or mouth cavity) swab.
According to the Department, DNA testing is expensive, complex and time consuming and thus should be recommended only if no other credible proof of the claimed relationship exists. Consular officers should treat DNA testing as a last resort: all other possible methods for confirming the existence of a biological relationship must be exhausted before recommending this course of action. Even then, DNA testing may only be recommended, but never required by the consular officer.
Consular officers may recommend DNA testing solely to prove a relationship; they may never recommend DNA testing in an attempt to disprove a relationship. Only DNA test results reporting a 99.5 percent or greater degree of certainty as proof of a biological relationship between a parent and child may be accepted in visa cases.
The Department clarifies that consular officers adjudicating Form I-130 Alien Relative petitions (http://www.h1b.biz/lawyer-attorney-1132137.html)are not authorized to approve the petition if DNA test results are the sole evidence of the claimed biological relationship. Such cases are not "clearly approvable" per the provisions of 9 FAM 42.41 N4.2-3; accordingly, they must be forwarded to USCIS for adjudication. Parenthetically, USCIS is authorized to approve I-130 petitions supported solely on DNA testing.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2009/11/i130_alien_relative_petitions.html)
laborlabor
01-22 01:26 PM
Its nice to know that the backlog center issue is also part of your agenda.
thanks...:)
thanks...:)
more...
h88
04-08 02:07 PM
Haha love it, fester! :thumb:
How about a new footer as well? :hugegrin:
How about a new footer as well? :hugegrin:
2010 Ryan Rodney Reynolds, with an
bobzibub
09-30 04:10 PM
...on a plan for �deep economic integration�
http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2008/09/19/national-post-editorial-board-free-trade-with-europe-is-worth-some-concessions.aspx
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Economic_Area
http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2008/09/19/national-post-editorial-board-free-trade-with-europe-is-worth-some-concessions.aspx
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Economic_Area
more...
cr125rider
04-23 07:40 PM
I dont mind the main font, the ammount one is cool. I think you need to find some way to make the contrast beter towards the right side of the main text, amybe with a different fill or a stroke. I like it!
hair Ryan Reynolds Spends
irukandji
02-11 04:22 PM
Hi Folks,
Can anyone please shed some light :
--I have EAD and 485 pending. My current status is H1B. But if I use my EAD without marriage...
--Later I get married and I cannot bring her here, but if I wait until my PD becomes current and at which point of time my spouse can be added to 485, so does my spouse need to maintain a valid non-immigrant status to be added to my 485 since she will be out of US.
Thanks,
iruk
Can anyone please shed some light :
--I have EAD and 485 pending. My current status is H1B. But if I use my EAD without marriage...
--Later I get married and I cannot bring her here, but if I wait until my PD becomes current and at which point of time my spouse can be added to 485, so does my spouse need to maintain a valid non-immigrant status to be added to my 485 since she will be out of US.
Thanks,
iruk
more...
gc28262
07-19 11:55 AM
What was the original I-140 revoked for ?
If it is not revoked for fraud or misrepresentation, you can port.
If it is not revoked for fraud or misrepresentation, you can port.
hot Ryan Reynolds has taken over
perm2gc
08-24 10:08 AM
Me, Masters In EE, Working in Medical Instrumentation at University.
Papers: 1st author 3, other 7
Conference/Posters: 1st author 3, other 13
Recommendation letters: 7post a detailed message..
Papers: 1st author 3, other 7
Conference/Posters: 1st author 3, other 13
Recommendation letters: 7post a detailed message..
more...
house Ryan Reynolds To Star In His
gc_chahiye
09-12 05:09 PM
Just saw this one:
http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_3800.html
Hope this helps.
Regards,
kamdard.
already discussed in the following threads:
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=13248
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=13222
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=13249
please check forum before you open a new thread for something like this. It is impossible that there is no post about any visa bulletin within 2 hours of its release. max. There are lots of eager beavers in IV :)
http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_3800.html
Hope this helps.
Regards,
kamdard.
already discussed in the following threads:
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=13248
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=13222
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=13249
please check forum before you open a new thread for something like this. It is impossible that there is no post about any visa bulletin within 2 hours of its release. max. There are lots of eager beavers in IV :)
tattoo hairstyles Ryan Reynolds Body
hopelessGC
04-15 12:11 PM
Got mine in November 2008. No issues at all.
more...
pictures ryan reynolds gossip
himu73
07-03 10:34 AM
If for a moment we say USCIS has really increased the processing rate and more people are getting green cards which we see is the case. It may signal that on Oct 1st,2007 dates will move ahead of what was the scenario in May visa bulletin.
If we forget the mistake they did in July bulletin and see the brighter side that they process faster, we should hold back our applications now and wait for the scenario on Oct 1st 2007, which would be hopefully a give a good realistic forward movement in dates. Since receipt date is important we should not get emotional and send in the application. This is just a thought.
Making Current in July was anyway like a lottery which denied all calculations based on pending cases.Before getting into law suits and protests which are also needed we have to take stock of all the implications and whether we really can provide 100% to these efforts.
From the posts coming since yesterday, most of the members are agitated and it seems we fail to realize that this event itself was a miscalculation and all of us were trying to get benefit of it considering the long waits we have endured for just getting a chance to file AOS.
We also knew that even if the applications are accepted there was no way we can get our green cards for a long time. AC21 and EAD for spouse was the main aim of many applicants.
This is really a sad story of people who have sacrificed career prospects, faced family separation, made important decisions like marraige.
Hope this post makes sense and we take a step back and reconsider our actions. This is not out of fear but past experience of lawsuits explained in other posts.
If we forget the mistake they did in July bulletin and see the brighter side that they process faster, we should hold back our applications now and wait for the scenario on Oct 1st 2007, which would be hopefully a give a good realistic forward movement in dates. Since receipt date is important we should not get emotional and send in the application. This is just a thought.
Making Current in July was anyway like a lottery which denied all calculations based on pending cases.Before getting into law suits and protests which are also needed we have to take stock of all the implications and whether we really can provide 100% to these efforts.
From the posts coming since yesterday, most of the members are agitated and it seems we fail to realize that this event itself was a miscalculation and all of us were trying to get benefit of it considering the long waits we have endured for just getting a chance to file AOS.
We also knew that even if the applications are accepted there was no way we can get our green cards for a long time. AC21 and EAD for spouse was the main aim of many applicants.
This is really a sad story of people who have sacrificed career prospects, faced family separation, made important decisions like marraige.
Hope this post makes sense and we take a step back and reconsider our actions. This is not out of fear but past experience of lawsuits explained in other posts.
dresses Ryan Reynolds
kumar1
10-09 09:05 AM
Unfortunately, You can not port PD in this case. Isn't it a mess!
more...
makeup Ryan Reynolds
sgorla
02-23 01:49 PM
Yes, unfortunately that is true. You can not use the experience that you gained with the current sponsoring emplloyer for your permanent residency application.
Hi, guys,
I'm having a little trouble with counting the years of experience for my EB2 petition. My attorney said I can only count the number of years I worked before joining the current sponsoring company!! The situation is, I jointed this company in Jan 2004. But my petition (Labor) appliction only started at the end of 2006. My attorney says that the three years of working experience (04, 05 & 06) can not be counted!
Is he correct on this?
thanks.
Hi, guys,
I'm having a little trouble with counting the years of experience for my EB2 petition. My attorney said I can only count the number of years I worked before joining the current sponsoring company!! The situation is, I jointed this company in Jan 2004. But my petition (Labor) appliction only started at the end of 2006. My attorney says that the three years of working experience (04, 05 & 06) can not be counted!
Is he correct on this?
thanks.
girlfriend Ryan Reynolds 400x644
ak_manu
10-30 12:07 PM
Hello,
I would need to apply for transit visa to fly through UK. There is a UK consulate office in ATLANTA but not sure if they would give transit visa if I go in person there? Did anyone had any experience.
Thanks
AK_MANU
I would need to apply for transit visa to fly through UK. There is a UK consulate office in ATLANTA but not sure if they would give transit visa if I go in person there? Did anyone had any experience.
Thanks
AK_MANU
hairstyles Ryan Reynolds and Sandra
krishnam70
07-05 02:07 PM
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/04/us/04visas.html
as pappu said why open new threads.. its already covered in other threads
as pappu said why open new threads.. its already covered in other threads
onemorecame
02-23 12:25 PM
https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/Processtimes.jsp?SeviceCenter=TSC
Service Center Proc Times 02/20/09 Update
NSC EB-485 Proc Time = 4 Month!?!
https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/Processtimes.jsp?SeviceCenter=NSC
is it mean something? is anybody got Soft LUD in thier case?
Service Center Proc Times 02/20/09 Update
NSC EB-485 Proc Time = 4 Month!?!
https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/Processtimes.jsp?SeviceCenter=NSC
is it mean something? is anybody got Soft LUD in thier case?
geesee
08-22 01:15 PM
^^^
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий